Given the data showing CCTV's ineffectiveness, why do stores persist with visible security tactics that don't prevent theft? Do you think it increases a product's desirability/perceived value since they seem harder to get?
I think supermarket are reluctant to remove these, even with the outcome is less clear. Given that they are already there, the cost of maintaining them is marginal.
Given the data showing CCTV's ineffectiveness, why do stores persist with visible security tactics that don't prevent theft? Do you think it increases a product's desirability/perceived value since they seem harder to get?
I think supermarket are reluctant to remove these, even with the outcome is less clear. Given that they are already there, the cost of maintaining them is marginal.
Also, CCTV could be used to provide evidence in support of conviction